Public Management
Saber Taghipour; Seated Najmedin Mousavi; Mohammad Hakkak; Reza Sepahvand
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to design a demonstration policy model in the banking industry. The present research method is based on a mixed approach and qualitatively and quantitatively in the inductive-deductive paradigm. The qualitative community studied in the current research was formed ...
Read More
The purpose of this study was to design a demonstration policy model in the banking industry. The present research method is based on a mixed approach and qualitatively and quantitatively in the inductive-deductive paradigm. The qualitative community studied in the current research was formed by all university professors in the field of public administration, banking management, strategic management, along with board members and CEOs of the country's banks, and the number of participants in this study was 18 people. Modeling, stratification and establishing conceptual communication between the dimensions of representational policy was done using interpretive structural modeling method. The quantitative statistical population of the study was made up of board members and senior managers of the country's banks. Sampling was done using the available non-probability method. In this regard, the number of 40 people from the desired statistical population was determined as the research sample. The findings of this study showed that organizational culture, personality characteristics of managers, environmental requirements, politicking, emotional intelligence, demonstrative management style, speculation, non-demanding, targeted orientation of public opinion, showcase performance, organizational conditions and organizational atmosphere as dimensions. The main policy makers are prominent in the banking industry.
Mohammad Hakkak; Masoome Momeni Mofrad; Saber Taghipour
Abstract
managers and macro-organizational policymakers have made relentless efforts to form a think tank. But unfortunately, the unfavorable outcomes of think tanks have shown that it is not effective. For this reason, identifying and finding conceptual connections between barriers to the formation of the think ...
Read More
managers and macro-organizational policymakers have made relentless efforts to form a think tank. But unfortunately, the unfavorable outcomes of think tanks have shown that it is not effective. For this reason, identifying and finding conceptual connections between barriers to the formation of the think tank can be a powerful facilitator of the formation of the think tank. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to model the barriers to the effective formation of the think tank. Identification of barriers to the formation of the think tank was conducted through semi-structured interviews with qualitative content analysis based on the theory of theoretical saturation with 16 professors of public administration and policy-making. The validity and reliability of the interviews were confirmed by the relative content validity method and the Cope Cohen index, respectively. Coding of interviews using Atlas ti software led to the identification of 12 major barriers to the formation of the think tank. In order to model the identified barriers, the opinions of 28 senior managers of government organizations in Lorestan province were used using a targeted sampling method and using a questionnaire. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed by using content validity and post-test method, respectively. Modeling the barriers identified by the interpretive structural method led to the formation of six levels, the weakest of experience, the lack of theoretical knowledge and undesirable feedback, the most influential, and the limited cultural conflict and limited collectivism.
